entry 60
“No matter
how unbiased and rational we claim or portray to be, some prejudices are so
ingrained that they are projected in our expression without any deliberation
behind.”
The main
motivation behind writing this piece is how the difference in thought process
and opinions of self and especially others shape the individualized world. Individualized
world is the creative existence as per one’s intellect and how one perceives
the stimulus. That said, thought process is the crux of that embodiment. Now,
thought process is an evolutionary, impressionable and critical in nature. A great
number of discernible and incomprehensible events have an evident impact on
person’s thinking. The place and persons we belong to, where the time spent the
most, especially the age 15-20, the people and groups we come in contact with,
whether knowingly or unintentionally. The songs we binge on, movies, series,
media, literature we intake. The most important of all are the drastic
experiences and the persons whom we idolize and create the surge of passion and
channelization of energy to do achieve something worthy. There are others
factors too but the above mentioned seemed salient to the present
writer, addition or subtraction could be made as one pleases.
College is the place and time
which directs person to their respective potential, also where core of person’s
ideals, principles, belief system and attitude is shaped and further flourished.
This is the transition phase from malleability towards rigidness. One gets
swayed by the random feed of various ideologies floating here and there, ends
up choosing which suits first and influence later. This act of choosing too
depends on the degree of audacity and timidity, altogether. Friends: loosing
earlier ones and escorting newer ones. All credits to prejudices that are concomitant, to which initially we fail to accept and later at some
point of acceptance it becomes quite hard to get rid of them. Ego, to abide by
the earlier taken stand and non-acceptance impede further.
This all leads to segregation and
this is the most dirty effect of- ‘my side and facts presented being right’ and
‘those presented by other segment, mere shibboleth’. The biggest issue with the
presentation/representation of facts is that they are very easily appropriated
as one pleases and molded to substantiate one’s stand. This insular approach
causes great harm to the progression of knowledge base, than to gain benefits of
exchange of opinion to broaden one’s perspective and get rid of prejudices. The
harm that it causes is the initiation of vicious cycle of appropriations. All sides
presenting appropriated and plagiarized data to emerge stronger rather focusing
on the real issue and come up with better solution for the general welfare of
society. This zeal to prove self being wiser gives birth to analogies and act
of extrapolation. The problem with this approach is that the model presented is
not an empirically tested one. It is just a brain child of an ingenious
participant who wants to prove the taken-stance right by neutral presentation. No
matter how sincerely it has been cultivated by taking due cognizance of other
stakeholder's biases, a skeptical mind would easily comprehend the enigmatic and
opinionated nuances sprinkled in the model. This causes non-acceptance of the
ideas presented in concise and less egotist manner, even if it is ethically
correct.
Poulo Coelho Sir has written," the world is changed by your example, not by your opinion".
A personal note-Most of the times we end of using our cursory knowledge about some subjects or intellect of someone else without giving any thought to what might have led to that output.The diversity in ideas should not become conflict, rather listening to other voices helps in enhancement of knowledge and reduction in preconceived notions. The differences must not be used to segregate but rather a medium to uphold the long standing traditions of discourse, which in turn enhances the cognitive thought process, both critical and creative.
- #RKD
.
Comments
Post a Comment