entry 59
I had this image of you inside of me - BOUND(1996)
One of the subliminal effects of being a cinema lover is
that the idealism in one gets a regular dose of romanticism. I humbly worship
that the romanticist in me never dies. Life proceeds through many stages of
evolution, the rationalism being hyped as the epitome of the process of gaining
sensibility. If one ever asks me the wonders that inspire to live and make my world surreal, cinema would be among the top threes. One just can’t name
this relationship being one-sided, as it has accommodated me so well within its
realm, showered love, took great care whenever indifference caused
hypnotization.
The interaction of the neurons with the continuum of frames
has caused synthesization of proclivity and eruption of various dream-like constructs of human forms, places and relationships. Among
others, the one that catches the fancy of my imagination is the construct of
“HER”. HER is not any-one cinematic character nor does a crush on actress
playing that character. It is lot more complicated than “it’s complicated”
status. Every character that throbbed the pump-set(heart), posses certain
traits that I fantasize to be present in HER. The simplest of all the
explanation of HER would be HER being the cumulation of nuances of all the
characters that I fell in love while experiencing the magic of cinema.
One can raise, is HER being the epitome of perfection for
you?
I will definitely pause and exclaim, “That’s a good
question!”. I don’t aspire for a soul-mate to be a perfectionist rather some imperfections are enticing; but still if some, not all traits do synchronize with HER that would be an absolute turn-on, would
follow up later. Will I ever be able to encounter HER, now that’s up to the
destiny that I embark upon. One thing is very clear after some sort of
rendezvous with the search of HER that I’ll not be putting further efforts like
the ones that I must be putting up in order to achieve my goals instead. Rather
I must first become man of HER dreams and let her to reach HER than just
praying to universal forces to conspire to stage the meet-up. And even after
the so-called love at first sight of euphoric moment, the rationality would
disrupt the peace and signal the happening mere coincident. Without knowing
iota of someone how we get affectionate to a stranger and start feeling that
she is the one, which at present seems mere-puerile fantasization. The idealism inside blurs
all the plausibility and conspire to build the queen of perfection who being
the most beautiful person by not just physique but with an all-angelic heart (HEART:
- when the brain being volcano erupts with lava of romanticism). To be honest, the
HER of mine is the most upfront hurdle as it impel mind to cogitate. This sense
of mine to analogize HER with her (had) always led to create a sense of
dissatisfaction. Not a person who looks out for flaws. For me, flawlessness is
next to inanimateness. I won’t like to die as a martyr to rationalism; rather I’ll love to be an unsung soldier deceased to pragmanticism (pragmatic + romanticism).
The pragmatic pole of mine signals out me loud that if I’m
destined to meet HER then definitely she would be up to the same path. What’s
the hurry? But the impatience sometimes takes the toll and the random
encounters many a times send signals of that being the one. When the path
intersects, that becomes the interesting journey to comprehend upon. The
romanticist for HER then initiates the proceedings to find out whether HER
outweighs her (victory of romantic pole-HEART) or her out perform the HER
“construct” (rationality prevails- MIND). Might be both would embrace each other's flaws
and compliments achieving unipole-pragmatic balance and peace, or, might! This
so-called want for her intertwined with HER leads to an ordeal, but still it
would be worth chancing upon.
"truly inspired by cinema"
Comments
Post a Comment